Trump: No deal with Iran until ‘unconditional surrender’ — Live updates

Lead: President Donald Trump said there will be no deal with Iran until an “unconditional surrender,” as the conflict between Israel, the United States and Iran entered its second week with airstrikes across Tehran, widespread interceptions in the Gulf and fresh US strikes inside Iran. The US Central Command said American forces have struck more than 3,000 targets inside Iran since the operation began. Dramatic video showed Tehran’s Mehrabad Airport on fire, while Gulf states reported dozens of intercepted missiles and drones overnight. The fighting has produced civilian damage, diplomatic fallout and mounting concerns about a wider regional war.

Key Takeaways

  • The US Central Command reported strikes on more than 3,000 targets inside Iran since last weekend as part of Operation “Epic Fury.”
  • Video geolocated by news teams showed Tehran’s Mehrabad Airport burning after early-morning airstrikes; the cause remains under investigation.
  • Gulf states reported substantial interceptions: the UAE said it intercepted nine ballistic missiles and 109 drones on Friday; Bahrain reported 84 missiles and 147 drones intercepted since the war began.
  • Saudi Arabia said it destroyed 16 drones headed for the Shaybah oil field; Shaybah produces about one million barrels per day, according to Aramco.
  • A federal grand jury convicted Asif Merchant in New York for plotting politically motivated killings in a 2024 scheme prosecutors say was backed by Iran; he faces up to life in prison.
  • CNN and other reporting documented damage to civilian infrastructure in Iran, including hospitals; the World Health Organization verified 13 strikes on healthcare facilities.
  • President Trump framed Iran’s leadership as needing replacement and said he expects to decide what “unconditional surrender” entails; a White House spokesperson said the president will determine terms.
  • Reports indicate Russia may be providing Iran with intelligence on US forces, a claim described by US officials as being tracked but not fully detailed publicly.

Background

The confrontation escalated last weekend after a series of coordinated US and Israeli strikes inside Iran, an operation the US military has termed “Epic Fury.” Those strikes targeted missile sites, IRGC command centers and communications nodes, and officials say they have degraded parts of Iran’s military infrastructure. Iran responded with a wave of retaliatory launches toward Israel and Gulf states, prompting a surge in regional air-defenses and interception claims across the Arabian Peninsula.

Longstanding tensions underpin this outbreak. Tehran and Washington have contended indirectly for years via proxy conflicts across the Middle East; the IRGC and allied militias have been implicated in attacks on US personnel and facilities in the region. Israel has repeatedly cited Iran’s ballistic and drone capabilities, along with its support for proxy groups such as Hezbollah, as existential threats. The current exchange has widened rapidly because of close operational cooperation between US and Israeli forces and because Gulf states’ infrastructure and shipping routes have become new front lines.

Main Event

In the early hours on Saturday, the Israel Defense Forces announced a “broad-scale wave of strikes” against targets in Tehran. State and open-source video showed explosions and smoke in parts of the Iranian capital and dramatic footage of Mehrabad Airport aflame. It is not yet publicly verified whether the airport itself was a primary target; officials and independent analysts are assessing the imagery and strike patterns.

Iran launched counterstrikes that moved toward Israeli airspace and regional targets; several countries in the Gulf reported intercepting incoming missiles and swarms of drones. The UAE said its forces intercepted nine ballistic missiles and 109 drones on Friday, while Saudi Arabia reported destroying drone threats bound for Shaybah, a major oil field. Local authorities in Bahrain and Kuwait likewise reported multiple interceptions.

Separately, US Central Command indicated American forces have conducted strikes inside Iran across hundreds of targets to degrade ballistic missile sites, IRGC command centers and maritime assets—saying 43 Iranian ships were damaged or destroyed. The US and Israeli militaries have been asked for further comment about specific target sets and measures taken to reduce civilian harm.

On the diplomatic and human side, a White House official said President Trump will attend a dignified transfer at Dover Air Force Base for six US service members killed earlier in the campaign. The airstrike that killed the six occurred at a makeshift operations center in Kuwait and has been a focal point for US political and military responses.

Analysis & Implications

Militarily, the campaign so far shows a rapid, high-intensity exchange combining long-range precision strikes, cruise- and ballistic-missile launches, and massed drone salvos. Interception tallies are high, but any saturation of air defenses carries risk of failure and unintended damage on the ground. Civilian harm appears to have occurred near several targeted complexes; verified imagery and WHO statements point to strikes close to hospitals and other non-military sites, raising questions about targeting processes and collateral risk mitigation.

Politically, President Trump’s public demand for an “unconditional surrender” raises legal and diplomatic issues. That phrase is a military slogan with few practical diplomatic contours; White House officials have suggested the president would define the terms. Such rhetoric complicates efforts by allies and neutral parties to deescalate and may harden Iranian resolve or domestic narratives that external attack justifies retaliation.

Economically, the conflict is already affecting global energy markets. Attacks and near-misses involving Gulf oil facilities and the strategic Strait of Hormuz have pushed fuel prices higher; analysts warn of continued volatility if strikes broaden or if shipping lanes are disrupted. The Shaybah field’s role as a roughly one-million-barrels-per-day producer underscores how even localized damage or disruption can ripple through markets.

Regionally, new alignments may deepen. Reporting that Russia has shared intelligence with Iran, if substantiated, would mark a significant escalation in outside-state involvement. Even without direct confirmation, such claims will shape NATO, EU and regional planning, potentially accelerating arms shipments, naval deployments and intelligence-sharing among US partners.

Comparison & Data

Country Missiles intercepted Drones intercepted Notes
United Arab Emirates 9 109 Ministry of Defense statement reported Friday
Bahrain 84 (total since start) 147 (total since start) MoI reported continued interceptions
Kuwait 14 12 State-run Kuwait News Agency report
Saudi Arabia 16 (Shaybah) 16 drones destroyed near Shaybah oil field

These tallies are drawn from official statements and state media aggregated during the initial days of fighting. Interception reports can reflect multiple systems tracking the same inbound objects, and independent verification of every claim is often difficult in near-real time. Still, the scale of reported interceptions indicates sustained, multi-front activity by Iranian forces and intense use of regional air defenses.

Reactions & Quotes

Officials framed the domestic legal response to Iran-linked threats as a separate but related front. A New York federal jury on Friday convicted Asif Merchant in a plot prosecutors said was backed by the IRGC. The Justice Department and FBI emphasized vigilance against foreign-directed plots on US soil.

“This was not the first attempt by Iran to harm our citizens on U.S. soil … Let this verdict serve as a reminder that the FBI is committed to detecting such threats and preventing acts of violence.”

Kash Patel, FBI Director (statement)

White House spokespeople sought to downplay foreign influence reports while asserting US operations are succeeding. Meanwhile, commanders and analysts are warning of the complexities of conducting precision campaigns in dense urban areas where civilian infrastructure sits close to military sites.

“We are completely decimating them,”

Karoline Leavitt, White House Press Secretary (comment on military operations)

On the ground in Iraqi Kurdistan, Kurdish leaders described fear and disruption after reports that the CIA had been supplying arms to certain Iranian Kurdish groups—an allegation that preceded renewed Iranian strikes on camps in northern Iraq.

“No military forces here, nobody, no one … but sure, after the start of this war we had some fighters just to guard and keep our people safe.”

Amanj Zibaee, KDPI leader (on strikes near Kurdish camps)

Unconfirmed

  • Reports that Russia is providing operational intelligence to Iran are described by US officials as based on multiple sources but have not been fully publicized or independently verified in all details.
  • Responsibility for the fire at Tehran’s Mehrabad Airport and for specific strikes near civilian hospitals and the school that reportedly killed more than 160 people has not been conclusively attributed to any party in open-source, independently verifiable accounts.
  • Claims about the precise number and type of munitions used at specific targets (for example, confirmation of 2,000-pound bombs at the IRIB compound) are informed by imagery and expert assessment but remain subject to further forensic confirmation.

Bottom Line

The conflict has moved rapidly from tit-for-tat strikes to sustained, multi-domain operations that combine long-range strikes, drone swarms and maritime attacks. Public statements—most notably President Trump’s call for an “unconditional surrender”—add rhetorical intensity and increase unpredictability about the end state sought by the US. Civilian harm, including verified strikes near hospitals and reports of large numbers of casualties at a school, will shape international responses and likely complicate efforts to limit escalation.

Energy markets, allied political cohesion and the risk of wider state involvement (including allegations of Russian assistance to Iran) mean the crisis could ripple beyond the immediate combatants. Near-term indicators to watch include further targeting patterns in Tehran, verification of reported foreign intelligence-sharing, and diplomatic moves by European and regional governments seeking to contain the fighting.

Sources

Leave a Comment