Live: Iran and Israel Vow to Fight On as Markets React to Trump

Lead: Iran and Israel each vowed on Tuesday to continue military operations as markets reacted to President Trump’s remark that the war could end “very soon.” The conflict, now in its second week of major cross-border strikes, has disrupted shipping through the Strait of Hormuz and sent oil prices swinging. U.S. and Israeli officials say strikes have degraded Iranian launch capacity, while Tehran insists it will press attacks on Gulf states and shipping. Civilians and diplomatic missions across the region are increasingly affected, with mass displacement reported in Lebanon and export routes for oil under urgent review.

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. and Israeli forces have struck roughly 5,000 targets inside Iran, a Pentagon figure cited by the Joint Chiefs chairman, and say Iran’s missile-launching capacity has been reduced by about 90%.
  • The UAE reported intercepting 8 ballistic missiles and 26 drones on Tuesday, and has tallied 262 detected ballistic missiles (241 destroyed) and 1,475 detected drones (1,385 intercepted) since the attacks began.
  • More than 40,000 Americans have returned to the U.S. since the war began; the State Department says it has directly assisted over 27,000 people abroad, while many evacuees declined offered charter flights.
  • The U.N. refugee agency says over 667,000 people in Lebanon registered on the government displacement platform in a single week after intensified Israeli-Hezbollah fighting.
  • Iraq, which exported more than 3.5 million barrels per day before the war, is exploring alternative export routes, including a northern pipeline to Ceyhan, Turkey, as Hormuz transit is disrupted.
  • Iranian officials claim a greater than 90% success rate for their missile and drone strikes, a figure presented without independent evidence.
  • Energy firms and market participants warn of severe economic fallout if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed; Saudi Aramco called the disruption the worst crisis the regional oil sector has faced.

Background

The current confrontation traces to escalating U.S.-Israeli operations against Iranian military sites and Iran’s retaliatory missile and drone strikes on Israel, Gulf Arab states and shipping in the region. The Strait of Hormuz, a chokepoint for roughly 20% of global oil shipments, has been a recurring flashpoint: Iran has periodically targeted tankers and disrupted traffic since hostilities intensified. Those attacks, combined with strikes on energy infrastructure, rapidly increased market volatility and prompted emergency responses from states and firms reliant on uninterrupted crude flows.

Hezbollah’s presence in southern Lebanon, long tied to Tehran’s regional strategy, became a direct front after Israel expanded operations beyond Iran to Iranian-backed proxies. Lebanon’s internal displacement, the targeting of residential areas and strikes that crossed borders have multiplied humanitarian and diplomatic complications. Regional powers and external actors — including Russia, the U.S. and European states — have moved staff or opened contingency channels while urging de-escalation or preparing contingency measures.

Main Event

On Tuesday the Israel Defense Forces accused Hezbollah of storing missiles, drones and other strategic weapons beneath residential buildings in the Dahieh district of Beirut, a Hezbollah stronghold previously struck during the 2024 campaign. An IDF spokesperson warned that such placement endangered Lebanese civilians and said those sites were legitimate military targets. Israeli airstrikes continued overnight across southern and eastern Lebanon as Israel said it was targeting Hezbollah capabilities.

At the Pentagon, Joint Chiefs Chairman Dan Caine said U.S. and Israeli strikes had hit some 5,000 targets inside Iran and that missile-launching activity had declined by roughly 90%. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth described a campaign that, he said, was degrading Iran’s military capability and called Iranian leaders “desperate, scrambling.” U.S. officials also reiterated strikes against maritime and naval targets to blunt Iran’s ability to threaten shipping lanes.

Tehran pushed back in public messaging. Iranian parliamentary and security spokespeople asserted battlefield momentum in Iran’s favor and claimed high success rates for their strikes. Iran’s Foreign Minister told PBS that talks with Washington were not on Tehran’s agenda and that Iran was prepared to continue strikes “as long as it takes.” Meanwhile, the IRGC said it would block oil exports to parties it deems hostile and asserted that Iran would determine when the war ends.

Diplomatic and civilian effects multiplied: the Netherlands relocated embassy staff to Azerbaijan citing safety concerns; the UAE reported a drone attack that struck a Bahraini apartment building, killing one woman and wounding eight; and the UAE consulate in Erbil, Iraq, reported material damage after a drone incident. Shipping advisories were issued after a merchant vessel reported a nearby splash and loud bang in the Persian Gulf.

Analysis & Implications

Militarily, both sides claim tactical gains: U.S.-Israeli strikes appear focused on Iran’s launch and production infrastructure, while Iran has expanded asymmetric attacks by striking shipping, Gulf states and using proxies. If the Pentagon’s 5,000-target figure and the claimed 90% reduction in launch capacity are accurate, Iran’s immediate ability to sustain large-scale barrages would be reduced, but Iran retains missile stocks and the will to use them — prolonging the risk to regional forces and civilians.

Economically, disruption of the Strait of Hormuz is the principal transmission channel to global markets. With roughly 20% of seaborne oil transiting the strait pre-war, even temporary closures or insurance and shipping reroutes push prices higher and force major producers and consumers to scramble for alternatives. Iraq’s stalled exports and Aramco’s warning of “catastrophic consequences” underscore the broad supply-chain exposure for aviation, agriculture and manufacturing beyond energy markets.

Politically, the conflict complicates domestic politics across the region and in the U.S. Tehran’s public posture — refusing talks while mobilizing paramilitary forces and issuing threats — reduces avenues for rapid diplomatic de-escalation. Conversely, mixed signals from Washington’s political leadership, including President Trump’s public prediction that the war will end “very soon” and threats to escalate further, create both market-moving headlines and uncertainties for military planners and diplomats about long-term objectives.

Comparison & Data

Metric Reported Figure
U.S./Israeli strikes inside Iran ~5,000 targets
Reported reduction in Iranian missile launches ~90%
UAE missile/drones detected (total) 262 missiles; 1,475 drones
UAE interceptions (total) 241 missiles destroyed; 1,385 drones intercepted
Lebanon displaced (registered) ~667,000 people in one week
Iraq pre-war exports >3.5 million barrels/day

The table aggregates public figures released by defense authorities, international agencies and national ministries. These numbers show the asymmetric nature of the conflict: high-volume strikes and counterstrikes, coupled with a disproportionate civilian and economic toll, especially on trade routes and energy infrastructure. Analysts caution such tallies are dynamic and depend on differing reporting standards and operational definitions of “target” or “intercept.”

Reactions & Quotes

Israeli military officials framed strikes on Lebanon as necessary to neutralize embedded weapons caches that put civilians at risk:

“Missiles, drones and additional weapons funded by the Iranian terror regime and designed to harm Israeli civilians” were found, the IDF said.

IDF spokesperson Nadav Shoshani (statement)

The U.S. defense leadership emphasized operational progress while warning further action could follow:

“We have struck some 5,000 targets in Iran,” and strikes have driven a 90% reduction in missile launches, the Joint Chiefs chairman said.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Dan Caine (Pentagon briefing)

Iranian officials rejected U.S. pressures and framed their campaign as defensive and enduring:

“I don’t think talking with the Americans would be on our agenda anymore,” Iran’s foreign minister said, and Iran’s IRGC added that it would determine when the war ends.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi; IRGC statement

Unconfirmed

  • Iranian claims that missile and drone strikes have a greater than 90% success rate lack independent verification from neutral monitors.
  • The Iranian Intelligence Ministry’s account of 30 arrests and the roles of specific foreign proxies have not been corroborated by external intelligence or third-party confirmation.
  • Attribution of the girls’ school bombing remains under investigation; preliminary U.S. assessments noted a likely but unintentional U.S. role, and official findings are pending.

Bottom Line

The conflict has entered a phase where kinetic operations, economic pressure and messaging compete in shaping outcomes. Military figures released by both sides show significant attrition of launch capabilities and extensive strikes, but neither diplomatic openness nor battlefield decisiveness appears sufficient yet to end hostilities. Markets will remain sensitive to statements from leaders and operational developments in the Strait of Hormuz; even brief escalations can trigger large price moves and logistical disruptions.

Humanitarian and diplomatic strains will likely deepen if fighting continues: mass displacement in Lebanon, threats to consulates and regional infrastructure, and rerouted oil exports will impose long-term recovery costs. Close monitoring of verified operational data, third-party confirmations and official investigation outcomes—especially for incidents with civilian harm—will be essential to distinguish fact from competing claims.

Sources

Leave a Comment