Offset Denies He Posted About Cardi B and Stefon Diggs’ Baby

Lead

Offset says he did not publish—and then remove—an Instagram story that appeared to reference Cardi B and her newborn with Stefon Diggs. The claim surfaced over the weekend and prompted a stern response from Cardi B, who warned about escalating online threats. A representative for Offset told TMZ the screenshot was fabricated and that the rapper has been supportive of Cardi. The incident has raised questions about how quickly manipulated content can spread and trigger real-world alarm.

Key Takeaways

  • Offset’s camp denies any Instagram story linking him to Cardi B and Stefon Diggs’ baby; the denial was reported November 17, 2025.
  • Cardi B publicly reacted to the viral post, warning followers the situation is “not normal” and describing fears about online threats.
  • Cardi and Offset married in 2017 and have three children together; Cardi filed for divorce in 2024.
  • Cardi recently gave birth to a son with Stefon Diggs, a wide receiver for the New England Patriots, which factored into the social-media attention.
  • The alleged message—reported as an Instagram Story reading “My kid lol”—was presented as a screenshot; Offset’s team calls that material fabricated.
  • It remains unclear who created the disputed post, how the image circulated, and whether platforms flagged or removed it.

Background

The couple at the center of the dispute, Cardi B and Offset, married privately in 2017 and later became public figures recognized both for their music and personal lives. Their relationship has been widely covered: they share three children and Cardi filed for divorce in 2024. In 2025 Cardi’s public profile expanded when she gave birth to a son with NFL receiver Stefon Diggs, drawing renewed attention to her family life.

Social platforms like Instagram and X have become primary venues for both authentic updates and manipulated content; screenshots and ephemeral stories are frequently reshared before verification. High-profile figures are particularly vulnerable to rapid amplification of misleading posts, which can provoke immediate emotional responses and, in some cases, safety concerns. That dynamic shaped reactions this weekend after a screenshot circulated that many users attributed to Offset.

Main Event

Over the weekend a screenshot purporting to show an Instagram Story from Offset—reportedly reading “My kid lol”—spread across social feeds and prompted Cardi B to respond publicly. Cardi wrote that the episode was serious and warned followers not to treat it as entertainment, noting her worry about threats she sees circulating online. The spread of the image led some followers to accuse Offset of harassment; others questioned whether the screenshot had been altered.

On November 17, 2025, a spokesperson for Offset told TMZ that any posts attributed to Offset on social media were “completely fabricated,” and said Offset has remained supportive of Cardi. The statement framed Cardi’s reaction as a response to misinformation and said the situation had been allowed to escalate. TMZ reported the spokesperson’s comment but did not identify who created the screenshot or how it first leaked.

Cardi’s public messages emphasized fear and a call for seriousness, referencing violent content she has seen online and the real-world risks those narratives can stoke. The combination of a newborn, a high-profile former partner, and an active NFL player created conditions for rapid public attention. As of this report there is no independent confirmation that Offset published or deleted the alleged story.

Analysis & Implications

The episode illustrates how quickly unverified social-media content can generate reputational harm and emotional distress. A single screenshot—whether genuine or doctored—can be amplified thousands of times in hours, often outpacing platforms’ ability to verify and remove falsified material. For public figures involved in family disputes or co-parenting, that speed can complicate private arrangements and lead to public misperceptions.

Legally, fabricated posts may expose creators to defamation or harassment claims, but proving authorship and malicious intent is often difficult, especially when images are cropped, screenshotted, or rehosted anonymously. Platforms may take action if content violates policy, but enforcement timelines vary and do not always undo the initial spread or the emotional impact on those targeted.

There are also potential career and brand impacts. For Stefon Diggs—identified in public reporting as the newborn’s father and a New England Patriots wide receiver—association with viral controversies can produce off-field distraction. Organizations with public profiles, including sports franchises and record labels, increasingly monitor such incidents because they can affect sponsorships and public relations.

Comparison & Data

Date Event
2017 Cardi B and Offset reportedly wed privately.
2024 Cardi B filed for divorce from Offset.
2025 (early–mid) Cardi gives birth to a son with Stefon Diggs (reported in 2025).
Nov 17, 2025 TMZ reports Offset’s spokesperson calls a viral post “completely fabricated.”

The timeline shows a sequence of public milestones that help explain the intensity of reaction when the disputed post surfaced. Each prior event—marriage, divorce filing, a new high-profile birth—heightens public interest and the likelihood that ambiguous content will be interpreted through an emotional lens. That context helps explain why a single circulating image produced immediate statements from both sides.

Reactions & Quotes

“Any statements attributed to Offset circulating on social media are completely fabricated. Cardi responded to misinformation, and the situation escalated unnecessarily.”

Offset spokesperson (statement to TMZ)

“Y’all be thinking it’s so funny and it’s not… This is not normal.”

Cardi B (Instagram post, reported by TMZ)

Unconfirmed

  • No independent verification of the screenshot’s origin or who allegedly fabricated it has been released.
  • It is not confirmed whether the platform (Instagram) received a report or removed the disputed image prior to broader circulation.
  • No public legal action or official investigation into the creation of the image has been announced as of November 17, 2025.

Bottom Line

The dispute over the purported Offset post underscores the real-world consequences of fast-moving, unverified social-media content. Even if a post proves to be fabricated, the emotional fallout and public reactions can be immediate and lasting—affecting relationships, reputations, and perceived safety.

For public figures and the platforms that host user content, this episode reinforces the need for quicker verification tools, clearer takedown pathways, and greater public literacy about manipulated images. Until those systems improve, similar incidents are likely to recur, especially when family matters and newborns intersect with celebrity and sport.

Sources

Leave a Comment