{"id":25110,"date":"2026-03-21T19:05:06","date_gmt":"2026-03-21T19:05:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/march-madness-winners-losers\/"},"modified":"2026-03-21T19:05:06","modified_gmt":"2026-03-21T19:05:06","slug":"march-madness-winners-losers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/march-madness-winners-losers\/","title":{"rendered":"The Winners and Losers of the First Round of the Men\u2019s NCAA Tournament &#8211; The Ringer"},"content":{"rendered":"<article>\n<p>The first weekend of the 2026 men\u2019s NCAA Tournament produced familiar drama and a few clear storylines: No. 1 Duke scraped by 16-seed Siena after a late tactical shift, No. 6 North Carolina surrendered a 19-point lead in an overtime loss to VCU, and a handful of narratives \u2014 from strength-of-schedule debates to injury luck \u2014 reshaped how teams will be evaluated heading into the round of 32. Games in Oklahoma City, Dayton and multiple regional sites revealed both roster depth issues and coaching decisions that will matter for the rest of March. While favorites largely advanced, a few performances and mishaps will reverberate for programs, coaches and committee conversations alike.<\/p>\n<h2>Key Takeaways<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Duke survived 1 vs. 16 pressure by switching to a press and a 3-2 zone late; Siena scored only five points on 12 possessions versus the zone, per Synergy.<\/li>\n<li>North Carolina blew a 19-point lead and lost in overtime to VCU; UNC missed eight free throws down the stretch and used a six-man rotation in the second half.<\/li>\n<li>Nebraska posted its first NCAA tournament win, beating Troy 76-47 in Oklahoma City behind Pryce Sandfort and transfer center Rienk Mast.<\/li>\n<li>Kentucky\u2013Santa Clara produced a late classic: Otega Oweh banked a 32-foot 3 to force OT and finished with 35 points, eight rebounds and seven assists in the overtime win.<\/li>\n<li>Villanova fell 86-76 to Utah State after coach Kevin Willard\u2019s in-game joking remarks about firing his staff drew awkward media attention.<\/li>\n<li>Iowa State\u2019s leading scorer Joshua Jefferson sprained an ankle three minutes into his team\u2019s opener and is uncertain for the round of 32.<\/li>\n<li>Strength-of-schedule debates intensified after High Point (30 wins) upset Wisconsin and Miami of Ohio\u2019s 3-point barrage in the First Four reinforced the portal-era mismatch between metrics and on-court results.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Background<\/h2>\n<p>The opening weekend always compresses season-long narratives into a handful of decisive moments, and 2026 was no different. Coaches who arrived with expectations \u2014 from Jon Scheyer at Duke to Hubert Davis at North Carolina \u2014 watched single games reframe questions about roster construction, in-game adjustments and program trajectories. The transfer portal and large NIL expenditures have accelerated roster turnover, making short-term evaluation trickier for selection committees and media alike.<\/p>\n<p>Mid-majors and low-major winners continue to fuel the discussion around schedule-adjusted metrics: teams with long win streaks or high win totals can be seeded lower because of weak nonconference slates, creating incentives and resentments that surfaced in interviews this weekend. At the same time, injuries and late-season returns remain wild cards; teams that appear deep on paper can be undone by a single absence, and tournament preparation often magnifies thin benches.<\/p>\n<h2>Main Event<\/h2>\n<p>Duke entered a spotlight game against 16-seed Siena with obvious personnel issues, most notably the ongoing absence of rim protector Patrick Ngongba. For roughly 23 minutes the MAAC champions outplayed the Blue Devils \u2014 faster on the perimeter, more physical, and energetic in ways Duke struggled to match. Trailing 47-36 with just over 17 minutes left, Scheyer called for a press and then settled into a 3-2 zone. The shift yielded immediate effect: Siena produced just five points on 12 possessions against the zone, and Duke used the change to generate fast-break scoring and rebounds that exhausted the Saints\u2019 short bench.<\/p>\n<p>North Carolina\u2019s collapse against VCU was among the weekend\u2019s clearest upsets of narrative. A 19-point lead evaporated as VCU\u2019s bench \u2014 led by Terrence Hill Jr. \u2014 produced 42 points and the game-winner in overtime. UNC\u2019s late-game sequence included eight missed free throws and defensive breakdowns on screens and switches that allowed VCU to hunt mismatches. Postgame, coach Hubert Davis expressed frustration and confusion when pressed about what went wrong, underscoring how quickly a single elimination game can spotlight program-level questions.<\/p>\n<p>Nebraska\u2019s 76-47 win over Troy registered more as a celebration than a competitive puzzle: the Huskers\u2019 fans filled the Paycom Center in Oklahoma City and watched a team built through transfers and a five-out philosophy dominate a less familiar opponent. Rienk Mast (a 6-foot-10 transfer who spaces the floor) and Pryce Sandfort (seven 3s vs. Troy) illustrated Fred Hoiberg\u2019s long-term blueprint, while the team\u2019s top-10 adjusted defensive efficiency on KenPom reinforced that Nebraska can pressure opponents into turnovers and transition opportunities.<\/p>\n<p>Kentucky and Santa Clara traded a late flurry that defined the second day: Allen Graves hit a go-ahead 3, then Otega Oweh banked a 32-foot 3 to force overtime and finished with a 35-8-7 stat line that saved Mark Pope from the kind of scrutiny long associated with high-NIL rosters that underperform. Villanova\u2019s season ended in a game against Utah State that will be remembered as much for on-court play as for Kevin Willard\u2019s poorly timed sarcasm about firing his staff during an in-game interview.<\/p>\n<h2>Analysis &#038; Implications<\/h2>\n<p>Coaching optics matter in March. Jon Scheyer\u2019s late adjustments against Siena bought his team a win, but the manner of the victory \u2014 needing a tactical second pitch and relying on a brief zone stretch to mask perimeter defense issues \u2014 raises questions about depth and matchup planning for Duke if Ngongba remains out. The Blue Devils\u2019 inability to stay in front of smaller guards and a reliance on late-game tactical fixes may trouble them against seasoned second-round opponents.<\/p>\n<p>At North Carolina, the loss exposes two related weaknesses: on-court execution (free throws, endgame defense) and the broader recruiting\/roster pipeline under Hubert Davis. The program\u2019s draft output since 2022 is modest by UNC standards, and while the coach has contractual security through 2030, administrative change at the AD level could narrow his margin for error if such exits continue. This is not an immediate firing situation, but a meaningful data point in evaluating program direction.<\/p>\n<p>The transfer portal and NIL era remain central to how programs are built and judged. Nebraska is a case study in efficient portal use: a center who can shoot and pass (Mast) plus a wing shooter (Sandfort) fit Hoiberg\u2019s five-out system and turned a previously underachieving program into a dangerous March team. Conversely, teams that spent heavily on transfers but saw injuries or poor fit (examples surfaced in Kentucky\u2019s broader roster conversation) may face harsher scrutiny if results don\u2019t match expenditures.<\/p>\n<h2>Comparison &#038; Data<\/h2>\n<figure>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Game<\/th>\n<th>Seed(s)<\/th>\n<th>Result<\/th>\n<th>Key stat<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Duke vs. Siena<\/td>\n<td>1 vs. 16<\/td>\n<td>Duke escaped<\/td>\n<td>Siena 5 pts on 12 possessions vs. zone (Synergy)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>North Carolina vs. VCU<\/td>\n<td>6 vs. 11<\/td>\n<td>VCU upset in OT<\/td>\n<td>UNC missed 8 free throws late<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Nebraska vs. Troy<\/td>\n<td>3 vs. 14<\/td>\n<td>Nebraska 76-47<\/td>\n<td>Rienk Mast + Sandfort hot from 3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Kentucky vs. Santa Clara<\/td>\n<td>2 vs. 15<\/td>\n<td>Kentucky won in OT<\/td>\n<td>Otega Oweh 35-8-7, game-tying 32-ft bank 3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Villanova vs. Utah State<\/td>\n<td>5 vs. 12<\/td>\n<td>Utah State 86-76<\/td>\n<td>Willard media gaffe in-game<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n<p>The table above condenses the weekend\u2019s decisive moments and a representative stat that influenced each outcome. Favorites largely advanced in many spots, but specific tactical choices, bench depth and in-game injuries created the critical inflection points.<\/p>\n<h2>Reactions &#038; Quotes<\/h2>\n<p>After the win over Siena, Scheyer acknowledged the defensive problems and described the adjustments that changed the game.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;Our defense was not there &#8230; you have to make adjustments, you have to throw different pitches.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><cite>Jon Scheyer, Duke coach<\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>North Carolina coach Hubert Davis pushed back when asked what went wrong after the VCU loss, a moment that underscored how coaches can be placed on the defensive in single-game elimination settings.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;What do you mean? &#8230; Just because you miss a shot doesn&#8217;t mean something is wrong.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><cite>Hubert Davis, North Carolina coach<\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Santa Clara coach Herb Sendek publicly disputed a missed timeout signal after the finish with Kentucky, saying officials did not recognize his call.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;I unequivocally called time out, but they didn&#8217;t grant it &#8230; I think the video evidence is clear.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><cite>Herb Sendek, Santa Clara coach<\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<h2>\n<aside>\n<details>\n<summary>Explainer: Five-out offense, strength of schedule &#038; the portal<\/summary>\n<p>Five-out offense spaces five players around the perimeter, forcing opposing bigs to defend away from the rim and creating driving and kick opportunities; it demands a center who can shoot and pass from the perimeter. Strength-of-schedule metrics adjust wins based on opponent quality and often penalize teams that play weak nonconference slates, which can skew committee seeding. The transfer portal has allowed coaches to construct rosters quickly, but it also increases roster turnover and makes season-long continuity harder to assess. Selection committees attempt to balance raw records with contextual data, but weekend results are increasingly used to re-evaluate what those metrics missed.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<\/aside>\n<\/h2>\n<h2>Unconfirmed<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Patrick Ngongba&#8217;s exact return timeline: Scheyer said he is close to returning, but no firm clearance date has been provided.<\/li>\n<li>Joshua Jefferson&#8217;s availability for Iowa State&#8217;s round of 32 game remains uncertain pending further evaluation of his sprained ankle.<\/li>\n<li>How much administrative change at North Carolina (new AD timeline) will affect Hubert Davis&#8217;s long-term job security is speculative and not confirmed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Bottom Line<\/h2>\n<p>The round of 64 reinforced that March is still a tournament of narrow margins: tactical adjustments, bench depth and single-game execution frequently mattered more than season-long narratives. Duke\u2019s late-game fix salvaged a dangerous matchup but highlighted roster vulnerabilities without Ngongba; North Carolina\u2019s loss magnified recruiting and roster questions that will follow Hubert Davis beyond a single night.<\/p>\n<p>For the committee and for programs, the weekend amplified two realities: metrics can miss context (fueling strength-of-schedule controversies) and the portal\/NIL ecosystem has made roster construction both more immediate and more fragile. As the field narrows, teams that combine durable defensive identities with reliable depth \u2014 and coaches who can both recruit and make timely in-game adjustments \u2014 will be the likeliest to survive the volatility of March.<\/p>\n<h2>Sources<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theringer.com\/2026\/03\/21\/college-basketball\/winners-and-losers-march-madness-first-round-duke-north-carolia-miami-ohio\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Ringer \u2014 original reporting and analysis<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.synergysports.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Synergy Sports \u2014 possession-level analytics<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/kenpom.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">KenPom \u2014 efficiency and adjusted metrics<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.espn.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ESPN Research \u2014 tournament historical data<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/CBSSportsCBB\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CBS Sports College Basketball (Twitter) \u2014 game coverage and coach clips<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/article>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The first weekend of the 2026 men\u2019s NCAA Tournament produced familiar drama and a few clear storylines: No. 1 Duke scraped by 16-seed Siena after a late tactical shift, No. 6 North Carolina surrendered a 19-point lead in an overtime loss to VCU, and a handful of narratives \u2014 from strength-of-schedule debates to injury luck &#8230; <a title=\"The Winners and Losers of the First Round of the Men\u2019s NCAA Tournament &#8211; The Ringer\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/march-madness-winners-losers\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about The Winners and Losers of the First Round of the Men\u2019s NCAA Tournament &#8211; The Ringer\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":25108,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rank_math_title":"Winners and Losers: Round of 64 Breakdown | The Ringer","rank_math_description":"A recap and analysis of the round-of-64: Duke survives, North Carolina\u2019s collapse, Nebraska\u2019s breakthrough, Otega Oweh\u2019s heroics, injuries and strength-of-schedule fallout.","rank_math_focus_keyword":"march madness, duke, north carolina, otega oweh, strength of schedule","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25110","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-top-stories"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25110","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25110"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25110\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/25108"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25110"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25110"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25110"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}