{"id":7038,"date":"2025-11-29T18:05:32","date_gmt":"2025-11-29T18:05:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/texas-longhorns-grades-texas-am\/"},"modified":"2025-11-29T18:05:32","modified_gmt":"2025-11-29T18:05:32","slug":"texas-longhorns-grades-texas-am","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/texas-longhorns-grades-texas-am\/","title":{"rendered":"How No. 16 Texas graded in 27-17 win over No. 3 Texas A&#038;M"},"content":{"rendered":"<article>\n<h2>Lead<\/h2>\n<p>On Nov. 28, 2025 at Darrell K Royal\u2013Texas Memorial Stadium, No. 16 Texas defeated No. 3 Texas A&amp;M 27-17, halting the Aggies\u2019 bid for an unbeaten regular season and an SEC title. The Longhorns (9-3, 6-2 SEC) produced a dominant second half, outgaining A&amp;M after the break and tightening their College Football Playoff case. Key players \u2014 notably running back Quintrevion Wisner and a steadied Arch Manning \u2014 turned the game in Texas\u2019 favor. The result leaves Texas waiting on the CFP selection committee while celebrating a rivalry win with clear postseason ramifications.<\/p>\n<h2>Key takeaways<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Final score: Texas 27, Texas A&amp;M 17; game played Nov. 28, 2025 at Darrell K Royal\u2013Texas Memorial Stadium.<\/li>\n<li>Second-half surge: Texas gained 285 of its 397 total yards after halftime while holding A&amp;M to 150 yards in the second half.<\/li>\n<li>Offensive balance: RB Quintrevion Wisner ran for a season-high 155 yards on 19 carries; Arch Manning added 70 rushing yards on seven carries and finished with 179 passing yards.<\/li>\n<li>Defensive impact: Texas limited A&amp;M to 337 total yards; A&amp;M QB Marcel Reed threw for 180 yards but had two late interceptions.<\/li>\n<li>Pass rush and special teams: DE Colin Simmons recorded his 11th sack of the season; Ethan Burke blocked a field goal and tallied a career-high nine tackles.<\/li>\n<li>Coaching adjustments: Steve Sarkisian\u2019s halftime tweaks produced a markedly cleaner second half with no turnovers from Texas.<\/li>\n<li>Playoff stakes: The win strengthens Texas\u2019 resume but leaves CFP prospects contingent on committee judgment and results elsewhere.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Background<\/h2>\n<p>The Lone Star Showdown between Texas and Texas A&amp;M carried outsized significance this season: A&amp;M entered 11-1 (7-1 SEC) and ranked No. 3, seeking its first perfect regular season since 1992 and a path to the SEC title game. Texas, ranked No. 16 (9-3, 6-2 SEC), needed a marquee win to bolster a r\u00e9sum\u00e9 that has featured strong conference play but some inconsistent performances earlier in 2025.<\/p>\n<p>Beyond records, the matchup represented contrasting narratives. A&amp;M\u2019s offense had been one of the nation\u2019s most productive, while Texas had shown flashes of elite play under coach Steve Sarkisian mixed with stumbles in key moments. Rivalry atmosphere and statewide attention amplified the stakes: a Texas victory could reshape CFP discussions and deny A&amp;M an SEC title-game berth.<\/p>\n<h2>Main event<\/h2>\n<p>The game began with Texas struggling to connect through the air; Arch Manning completed 8 of 22 passes for 52 yards in the first half, but the Longhorns steadied after halftime. Manning\u2019s second-half line improved markedly (6-of-7 for 127 yards and a touchdown), and he also contributed 70 rushing yards on seven carries. Sacks accounted for negative 17 yards on the day, while a 35-yard rushing touchdown provided a momentum swing for Texas.<\/p>\n<p>Quintrevion Wisner supplied the most consistent offensive punch, rushing 19 times for a season-high 155 yards and helping Texas control tempo. The offensive line allowed just two sacks and opened lanes that produced a team rushing average of 6.2 yards per carry on the day, marking Texas\u2019 first 100-yard rusher since last December\u2019s CFP win over Clemson.<\/p>\n<p>Defensively, Texas tightened in the second half. The Longhorns limited A&amp;M to only 150 yards after halftime and 337 total yards overall. Senior end Ethan Burke posted nine tackles, blocked a field goal and made a key special-teams play, while tackle Cole Brevard and the front line contained the Aggies\u2019 ground game to 157 rushing yards.<\/p>\n<p>The secondary made the game-sealing plays late: safety Michael Taaffe and corner Kobe Black recorded interceptions in the final moments, halting A&amp;M drives and preserving the margin. A&amp;M QB Marcel Reed finished 20-of-32 for 180 yards and the two picks; those turnovers were decisive in a game where field position and late drives mattered most.<\/p>\n<h2>Analysis &amp; implications<\/h2>\n<p>From a roster-evaluation standpoint, the win answered several questions for Texas. The offense showed it can pivot from a tentative first half to an efficient second half, pairing a productive running game with improved protection and downfield passing. Wisner\u2019s 155-yard performance demonstrated the backfield depth Texas can depend on when the passing game stalls.<\/p>\n<p>Defensively, the Longhorns\u2019 ability to clamp down after intermission suggests effective halftime adjustments by the coaching staff and execution by veterans on the front seven. Holding A&amp;M to 150 second-half yards and forcing two late interceptions limited the Aggies\u2019 comeback window and underscored the secondary\u2019s late-game composure.<\/p>\n<p>Strategically, the victory bolsters Texas\u2019 CFP argument but does not guarantee a berth. The committee weighs body of work, conference championships and comparative metrics; a high-profile win over a top-3 rival improves resume strength but leaves Texas dependent on other results and the committee\u2019s assessment of schedule quality.<\/p>\n<p>Economically and programmatically, beating A&amp;M has recruiting and momentum implications across Texas and the region. The win provides an offseason talking point for coaching staff and a recruiting boost against an in-state rival, while denying A&amp;M an SEC title-game appearance\u2014an outcome with both competitive and financial ripple effects.<\/p>\n<h2>Comparison &amp; data<\/h2>\n<figure>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Team \/ Metric<\/th>\n<th>Total yards<\/th>\n<th>Second-half yards<\/th>\n<th>Leading rusher<\/th>\n<th>Top passer<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Texas<\/td>\n<td>397<\/td>\n<td>285<\/td>\n<td>Quintrevion Wisner, 155 yards<\/td>\n<td>Arch Manning, 179 yards<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Texas A&amp;M<\/td>\n<td>337<\/td>\n<td>150<\/td>\n<td>Team rushing, 157 yards<\/td>\n<td>Marcel Reed, 180 yards<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n<p>The table highlights Texas\u2019 second-half dominance (285 of 397 yards) and the game\u2019s statistical leaders. Texas\u2019 rushing success (6.2 yards per carry team average) contrasted with A&amp;M\u2019s inability to sustain drives after halftime. These figures contextualize why the Longhorns pulled away in the fourth quarter.<\/p>\n<h2>Reactions &amp; quotes<\/h2>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;We made the adjustments at halftime and executed what we practiced all week,&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><cite>Postgame remarks attributed to Texas head coach Steve Sarkisian (paraphrase)<\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Context: Coaching staff identified protection and play selection as focal points at halftime; the offense\u2019s improved efficiency in the second half reflects those adjustments.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;Our guys fought, but turnovers at the end hurt the comeback effort,&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><cite>Postgame remarks attributed to Texas A&amp;M coach (paraphrase)<\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Context: A&amp;M\u2019s late interceptions by the Longhorns\u2019 secondary ended two drives and limited opportunities in the fourth quarter.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;Quintrevion was physical and decisive; he changed the tone in the second half,&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><cite>Postgame observation from a Texas defensive staff member (paraphrase)<\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Context: Wisner\u2019s 155 rushing yards and consistent gains helped control the clock and relieve pressure on the passing game.<\/p>\n<aside>\n<details>\n<summary>Explainer \u2014 College Football Playoff context<\/summary>\n<p>The College Football Playoff selection committee evaluates teams on a combination of record, conference championships, strength of schedule, head-to-head results and comparative outcomes. Signature wins over top-ranked opponents improve a team&#8217;s profile, but selection also depends on how other contenders finish their seasons and whether a conference title is won. For a one-loss or two-loss team, late-season wins against top opponents can be decisive, but they do not guarantee inclusion.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<\/aside>\n<h2>Unconfirmed<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Whether the two late interceptions definitively end Marcel Reed&#8217;s Heisman hopes remains unconfirmed and subject to voter interpretation.<\/li>\n<li>How the CFP committee will rank Texas after this win is unresolved; selection is pending until the committee\u2019s final decision.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Bottom line<\/h2>\n<p>Texas\u2019 27-17 victory over No. 3 Texas A&amp;M was a statement in rivalry terms and a critical piece of evidence for the Longhorns\u2019 postseason case. A dominant second half, a 155-yard effort from Quintrevion Wisner and a stingy defensive performance combined to deny A&amp;M an unbeaten regular season and an SEC title-game spot.<\/p>\n<p>While the win strengthens Texas\u2019 argument for a playoff spot, the program\u2019s fate now rests partly on external factors \u2014 the CFP committee\u2019s evaluation and other teams\u2019 results. Practically, the game delivers momentum for recruiting and offseason narratives, but it also sets a clear bar: Texas must wait to see if the signature victory is enough.<\/p>\n<h2>Sources<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.statesman.com\/sports\/college\/longhorns\/football\/article\/texas-vs-texas-am-sec-grades-longhorns-21204930.php\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Austin American-Statesman<\/a> \u2014 Local newspaper\/beat reporting (game recap and grades)<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncaa.com\/boxscore\/football\/2025-11-28\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NCAA box score (where available)<\/a> \u2014 Official statistics (box score and official game stats)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/article>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lead On Nov. 28, 2025 at Darrell K Royal\u2013Texas Memorial Stadium, No. 16 Texas defeated No. 3 Texas A&amp;M 27-17, halting the Aggies\u2019 bid for an unbeaten regular season and an SEC title. The Longhorns (9-3, 6-2 SEC) produced a dominant second half, outgaining A&amp;M after the break and tightening their College Football Playoff case. &#8230; <a title=\"How No. 16 Texas graded in 27-17 win over No. 3 Texas A&#038;M\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/texas-longhorns-grades-texas-am\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about How No. 16 Texas graded in 27-17 win over No. 3 Texas A&#038;M\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7034,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rank_math_title":"No. 16 Texas graded in 27-17 win vs Texas A&M \u2014 Insight","rank_math_description":"Texas (No. 16) beat No. 3 Texas A&M 27-17 on Nov. 28, 2025. Our grades break down key performers, second-half surge, defensive stands and CFP implications.","rank_math_focus_keyword":"Texas Longhorns, Texas A&M, College Football Playoff, Arch Manning, Quintrevion Wisner","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7038","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-top-stories"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7038","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7038"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7038\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7034"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7038"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7038"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7038"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}