{"id":9506,"date":"2025-12-14T23:06:21","date_gmt":"2025-12-14T23:06:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/ravens-blank-bengals-24-0\/"},"modified":"2025-12-14T23:06:21","modified_gmt":"2025-12-14T23:06:21","slug":"ravens-blank-bengals-24-0","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/ravens-blank-bengals-24-0\/","title":{"rendered":"Ravens Blank Bengals 24-0 in Coldest Game in Franchise History"},"content":{"rendered":"<article>\n<h2>Lead<\/h2>\n<p>On Sunday in Cincinnati, the Baltimore Ravens defeated the Cincinnati Bengals 24-0 in what the team called the coldest game in franchise history. Baltimore&#8217;s defense held the Bengals to 298 total yards and produced a decisive turnover that became an 84-yard scoring play. Joe Burrow was held without a touchdown for the first time in his career as a starter. The result gave the Ravens a key divisional victory in the AFC North.<\/p>\n<h2>Key Takeaways<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>The Ravens won 24-0 on the road, recording a shutout in frigid conditions that the team said was the coldest in franchise history.<\/li>\n<li>Baltimore limited Cincinnati to 298 total yards while gaining 317 yards of its own.<\/li>\n<li>Joe Burrow was held scoreless for the first time as a starting NFL quarterback; he threw for 225 yards.<\/li>\n<li>Lamar Jackson completed 8-of-12 passes for 150 yards, two touchdowns and one interception.<\/li>\n<li>Rasheem Ali scored his first career touchdown on a 30-yard reception from Jackson.<\/li>\n<li>Zay Flowers finished with 68 receiving yards and hauled in a 28-yard touchdown late in the second quarter.<\/li>\n<li>The decisive defensive play came when Kyle Van Noy intercepted Burrow and Alohi Gilman returned it 84 yards after a handoff to seal the game.<\/li>\n<li>The Ravens rushed for 189 yards as a team, with Derrick Henry gaining 100 yards on 11 carries.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Background<\/h2>\n<p>The AFC North matchup carried extra weight for both clubs as they jockey for positioning late in the season. Cold-weather football is a familiar subplot in this division, and Sunday\u2019s temperatures added a layer of strategy around ball security and field position. Historically, the Ravens have leaned on a physical defense and a mobile quarterback to control such games; this contest fit that template.<\/p>\n<p>Cincinnati entered with playoff ambitions and a passing attack led by Joe Burrow and Ja&#8217;Marr Chase. The Bengals\u2019 offense typically stretches opponents vertically, but the Ravens&#8217; front and secondary have been emphasizing pressure and contested catches in recent weeks. Special teams and turnovers were expected to be decisive factors, given the forecast and the stakes.<\/p>\n<h2>Main Event<\/h2>\n<p>The first half remained scoreless until late in the second quarter, when the Ravens produced a five-play, 80-yard drive that swung momentum. With 1:05 remaining before halftime, Zay Flowers made a 26-yard sideline catch in tight coverage on the drive\u2019s opening play and later caught a 28-yard touchdown from Lamar Jackson. That score put Baltimore up 14-0 heading into the break.<\/p>\n<p>In the third quarter the Ravens extended the lead with a 27-yard field goal, moving ahead 17-0. Baltimore&#8217;s ground game, paced by Derrick Henry, consistently moved the chains and kept Cincinnati\u2019s offense off the field despite the disparity in time of possession. Henry reached 100 rushing yards on just 11 carries, contributing to a 189-yard team rushing total.<\/p>\n<p>Midway through the fourth quarter, Cincinnati drove into Baltimore territory and appeared poised to respond. On fourth down, Kyle Van Noy dropped into coverage and intercepted Joe Burrow; according to the play account, Van Noy handed the ball to Alohi Gilman, who returned it 84 yards for a touchdown. The play was recorded as an interception return and pushed the final margin to 24-0.<\/p>\n<h2>Analysis &#038; Implications<\/h2>\n<p>The shutout underscores how complementary football can overwhelm an offense even when it holds the ball for a larger share of the clock: Cincinnati had 39:19 time of possession versus Baltimore\u2019s 20:41 but produced no points. The Ravens\u2019 defensive game plan\u2014prioritizing pressure and taking away the deep target to Ja\u2019Marr Chase\u2014forced the Bengals into shorter gains and a lower third-down conversion rate (3 of 15).<\/p>\n<p>Lamar Jackson\u2019s conservative, efficient passing performance and the effectiveness of the run game allowed Baltimore to avoid turnovers and sustain drives when needed. Jackson\u2019s two touchdown passes were pivotal in building an early lead that the defense could protect. For Cincinnati, the inability to convert red-zone and third-down opportunities proved decisive despite outgaining the Ravens in time of possession.<\/p>\n<p>From a standings perspective, the win is significant for Baltimore\u2019s AFC North positioning; a divisional shutout provides both a tiebreaker asset and a morale boost. For Cincinnati, the loss raises questions about finishing drives and protecting elite playmakers in adverse weather, elements that will be scrutinized by coaches and analysts as the playoffs approach.<\/p>\n<h2>Comparison &#038; Data<\/h2>\n<figure>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th><\/th>\n<th>Ravens<\/th>\n<th>Bengals<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Final Score<\/td>\n<td>24<\/td>\n<td>0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Total Yards<\/td>\n<td>317<\/td>\n<td>298<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Time of Possession<\/td>\n<td>20:41<\/td>\n<td>39:19<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Rushing Yards<\/td>\n<td>189 (D. Henry 100)<\/td>\n<td>&#8212; (Chase Brown 53)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Passing Leader<\/td>\n<td>Lamar Jackson, 150<\/td>\n<td>Joe Burrow, 225<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Turnovers<\/td>\n<td>2 forced<\/td>\n<td>1<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n<p>The table highlights an unusual dynamic: Baltimore converted fewer possessions into a larger scoring efficiency, while Cincinnati controlled the clock but not the scoreboard. Third-down efficiency favored the Ravens (2-of-7) in scoring situations, whereas the Bengals went 3-of-15 overall, limiting sustained scoring drives.<\/p>\n<h2>Reactions &#038; Quotes<\/h2>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Final: Ravens 24, Bengals 0.<\/p>\n<p><cite>Baltimore Ravens (official)<\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That summary line appeared on the team\u2019s official recap and reflects the scoreline that underlined Baltimore\u2019s defensive performance. Team communications emphasized the defensive takeaway and the rarity of a division road shutout.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Joe Burrow held without a touchdown for the first time as a starter.<\/p>\n<p><cite>Game Notes \/ Team Records<\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>League and team records noted the significance of that benchmark; analysts will examine how the Bengals\u2019 offense functioned without reaching the end zone despite multiple drives into opponent territory.<\/p>\n<h2>\n<aside>\n<details>\n<summary>Explainer: Why cold affects play<\/summary>\n<p>Lower temperatures typically make the football firmer and slipperier, affecting catching and kicking. Cold can also stiffen players&#8217; muscles and influence play-calling toward shorter, more controlled plays. Teams that prepare with cold-weather practice, emphasis on ball security and a strong running game often gain an advantage. The Ravens\u2019 run-first approach and disciplined tackling limited big plays in these conditions.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<\/aside>\n<\/h2>\n<h2>Unconfirmed<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>The precise ambient temperature and how it ranks against every previous Ravens game were not specified in the game summary and remain unverified here.<\/li>\n<li>Details of the exact mechanics of the interception-to-return (the reported handoff between Van Noy and Gilman) are based on the official play description; additional video review may clarify the sequence.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Bottom Line<\/h2>\n<p>Sunday\u2019s 24-0 victory was a defensive statement by the Ravens in a high-stakes divisional matchup played in extreme cold. Baltimore combined an efficient passing line from Lamar Jackson with a dominant rushing attack and timely turnovers to neutralize Cincinnati\u2019s attack. The shutout is notable not only for the margin but for the way special defensive plays\u2014most prominently the fourth-quarter interception return\u2014sealed the outcome.<\/p>\n<p>Looking ahead, the Ravens return home next week to host the New England Patriots on Sunday Night Football, carrying momentum and a boost in divisional standing. For the Bengals, the loss clarifies areas for correction\u2014red-zone execution and third-down conversions\u2014before the postseason push.<\/p>\n<h2>Sources<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.baltimoreravens.com\/news\/lamar-jackson-joe-burrow-ravens-defense-bengals-recap\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Baltimore Ravens \u2014 Official game recap<\/a> (official team site)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/article>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lead On Sunday in Cincinnati, the Baltimore Ravens defeated the Cincinnati Bengals 24-0 in what the team called the coldest game in franchise history. Baltimore&#8217;s defense held the Bengals to 298 total yards and produced a decisive turnover that became an 84-yard scoring play. Joe Burrow was held without a touchdown for the first time &#8230; <a title=\"Ravens Blank Bengals 24-0 in Coldest Game in Franchise History\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/ravens-blank-bengals-24-0\/\" aria-label=\"Read more about Ravens Blank Bengals 24-0 in Coldest Game in Franchise History\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":9505,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rank_math_title":"Ravens Blank Bengals 24-0 \u2014 Game Recap | Ravens Home","rank_math_description":"In the coldest game in franchise history, the Baltimore Ravens shut out the Bengals 24-0, holding Joe Burrow scoreless and dominating on defense. Full recap and analysis.","rank_math_focus_keyword":"Ravens,Bengals,shutout,Joe Burrow,Lamar Jackson,defense","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9506","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-top-stories"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9506","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9506"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9506\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9505"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/readtrends.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}