Why young Britons are choosing to work abroad

Lead: In the year to June 2025, an estimated 195,000 people under 35 left the UK to live and work overseas, driven by high housing costs, squeezed pay packets and a difficult graduate labour market. Interviews with young migrants and figures from the Office for National Statistics show destinations ranging from Tokyo and Dubai to Australia and Bali. Many cite better pay prospects, lower taxes or a safer everyday environment as pull factors, while others say UK cultural and career conditions pushed them to go. The immediate result is a fresh wave of young talent building careers and businesses abroad, at least for the medium term.

Key takeaways

  • ONS estimate: 195,000 people under 35 emigrated in the year to June 2025, and roughly 75% of British nationals leaving in that period were aged under 35.
  • Top individual destinations reported by interviewees include Japan (Tokyo), the UAE (Dubai), Australia, South Korea, Hong Kong, Bali and South Africa (Cape Town).
  • Push factors named by migrants include rising rents, limited graduate vacancies and a perceived hostile cultural climate in the UK.
  • Pull factors include tax incentives (for example, no income tax in the UAE), targeted visa routes (golden visas, top-graduate visas) and perceived safety or quality of life improvements.
  • Many migrants continue to run UK-registered businesses or manufacture in the UK while operating from overseas hubs.
  • ONS has recently adjusted how it estimates migration, making direct year-on-year comparisons harder; that methodological change affects interpretation of trends.
  • Financial advisers note families are increasingly funding emigration costs rather than home deposits, shifting how young people access opportunities abroad.

Background

The migration picture for Britain has shifted after several years of economic and social pressure points: housing affordability has worsened, typical graduate entry roles are scarcer in some sectors, and real pay growth has been weak. Government and private-sector commentary emphasize job creation aims, but young people report a mismatch between opportunities and aspirations. Historically, British emigration has seen peaks tied to economic cycles; the current movement is notable for its concentration among young adults choosing non-traditional destinations as career launchpads.

Two parallel dynamics are at work. First, destination countries have introduced visa routes and incentives aimed at attracting skilled or entrepreneurial migrants—examples include multi-year residency for creators and special graduate visas. Second, the growth of remote work and digital freelancing lets people relocate without quitting an income stream tied to UK or global clients. Together, these trends make international moves both more feasible and more attractive.

Main event

Individual stories illustrate the wider pattern. Ray Amjad, 25, left the UK after travelling and working remotely; he took a two-year ‘top graduates’ visa to Tokyo and plans to seek permanent residency. Ray says Tokyo’s lower petty-crime rates and lower equivalent rental costs compared with London were decisive in his move. He also highlighted that Japan benefits from an influx of graduates who arrive already trained and able to contribute.

Isobel Perl, 30, built a skincare business in the UK and plans to move to Dubai after securing a long-stay creator visa. She described Dubai as an energising commercial environment where tax rules and a thriving entrepreneurial community aid scaling. Isobel intends to keep UK-based manufacturing for product quality while running international distribution from the UAE.

Sol Hyde, 25, left a corporate role after deciding the job was harming his wellbeing, launched a marketing consultancy in January and spent much of the year working from Bali with a remote-first team. He emphasises the social benefit of co-working with peers and says that being abroad has improved his work–life balance and business growth prospects. Sol frames his move as a medium-term choice rather than permanent exile.

Analysis & implications

The wave of young Britons leaving for work abroad has several economic implications. In the short term, destination economies gain skilled labour, entrepreneurial energy and tax receipts they otherwise would not have. The UK, meanwhile, risks localized skills shortages in sectors where graduates would traditionally accumulate early career experience. This talent transfer can reduce domestic innovation spillovers and weaken some future leadership pipelines.

Policy responses are constrained by trade-offs. Tax cuts or targeted incentives can retain some workers, but those measures are politically costly and cannot address all cultural or lifestyle drivers. Improving graduate pathways and early-career vacancies is a longer-range solution; any effective domestic response will require coordination across education, employers and regional development initiatives.

For individuals and firms, the shift increases the importance of cross-border portability—pensions, tax arrangements, corporate structures and remote employment law. Businesses that can support hybrid or fully remote teams have an opportunity to retain relationships even if employees relocate. Financially, families supporting emigration instead of home deposits changes household balance sheets and may affect long-term wealth accumulation patterns in the UK.

Comparison & data

Measure Value (year to June 2025)
Under‑35 emigrants 195,000
Share of emigrants under 35 ~75%
ONS headline figures for the year to June 2025 (ONS methodology revised; comparisons across years need caution).

These two headline numbers encapsulate the scale and age skew of recent departures, but the ONS change in estimation methods means trend analysis requires care. Qualitative reporting here shows a spread of destinations and motivations, from fiscal incentives in the Gulf to lifestyle and safety considerations in East Asia and lifestyle hubs like Bali.

Reactions & quotes

“Destinations like the UAE offer tax‑free living, a ‘can‑do’ attitude and a business‑friendly environment that feels far more optimistic and rewarding.”

David Little, Evelyn Partners (wealth manager)

David Little’s comment frames the economic attraction in investor and entrepreneur terms: tax regimes and upbeat local markets are a strong pull for people weighing relocation.

“Every young person deserves a fair chance to succeed and when given the right support and opportunities, they will grasp them.”

Department for Work and Pensions (official statement)

The DWP highlighted government measures designed to support start‑ups and jobs, pointing to ongoing efforts to improve domestic opportunities for young people.

“It feels much safer in Tokyo. I can leave my laptop in a cafe and it’s still going to be there.”

Ray Amjad (migrant, 25)

Personal testimony underscores how non‑economic factors such as daily security and public order can be central to migration decisions.

Unconfirmed

  • The long‑term permanence of many moves is uncertain; several interviewees describe medium‑term plans rather than permanent settlement.
  • Because ONS changed migration estimation methods, whether this period marks an unprecedented rise or a methodological artefact is not fully resolved.
  • Aggregate figures do not reveal sectoral skill gaps—precise industry‑level impacts in the UK remain under investigation.

Bottom line

About 195,000 under‑35 Britons relocating in the year to June 2025 reflects a mix of economic, cultural and lifestyle drivers rather than a single cause. Fiscal incentives abroad, visa innovations and the feasibility of remote work combine with domestic pressures such as housing costs and constrained graduate hiring to push and pull this demographic northward, southward and eastward.

If the UK wants to slow long‑term outflows of young talent it must address both economic fundamentals—affordable housing, graduate entry jobs and business support—and cultural factors that affect how success is perceived and rewarded. In the meantime, many migrants plan to retain UK ties: businesses, manufacturing bases or eventual returns remain plausible, meaning the UK could benefit from new international networks if policy and firms adapt.

Sources

Leave a Comment