Lee Jae‑myung Meets Xi in Beijing to Reset Frayed Korea‑China Ties

South Korean President Lee Jae‑myung visited Beijing on Sunday and met Chinese leader Xi Jinping on Monday in a bid to repair strained ties with Seoul’s largest trading partner. The talks — their second summit since Xi’s visit to Seoul in November — covered regional security, North Korea, and Beijing’s long‑standing informal restrictions on Korean popular culture. Lee told Koreans in Beijing the trip should “serve as a new starting point” to restore and upgrade bilateral relations. Officials said Lee will also press China to avoid using economic links as leverage amid wider geopolitical tensions.

Key Takeaways

  • This visit is the first by a South Korean president to China since 2019 and the second summit between Lee and Xi since November.
  • Lee arrived in Beijing on Sunday and met Xi on Monday; his itinerary includes meetings with Premier Li Qiang, parliament chair Zhao Leji, and a stop in Shanghai.
  • Topics on the agenda included regional security, North Korea, China’s unofficial restrictions on K‑pop and dramas, and maritime structures in shared waters.
  • Seoul reiterated respect for the One China policy while balancing plans to visit Japan later in the month to meet Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi.
  • Seoul faces immediate security pressures: South Korea’s military reported ballistic missile launches by North Korea off its east coast, and state media in Pyongyang said it had test‑fired hypersonic missiles on Monday.
  • Lee seeks Chinese cooperation to pressure Kim Jong Un on denuclearization; Beijing remains Pyongyang’s principal economic and diplomatic backer, alongside Russia.
  • China’s unofficial curbs on Korean entertainment have lasted about a decade and are understood to relate to Seoul’s 2016 deployment of the US THAAD missile defence system.

Background

Korea‑China relations have oscillated between close economic interdependence and political friction. China is South Korea’s largest trading partner and a major market for cultural exports, making Beijing an essential interlocutor for Seoul’s economy and soft‑power industries. Diplomatic strains deepened after Seoul accepted a US‑deployed Terminal High Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) battery in 2016, which Beijing viewed as a threat to its own strategic settings.

At the same time, South Korea remains a formal US ally with American troops stationed on the peninsula for decades, and Seoul has pursued closer defence cooperation with Washington, including a controversial announcement last year to work on nuclear‑powered submarines. Regionally, rising tensions between China and Japan over Taiwan place Seoul in a sensitive position: it maintains historic ties and security relationships with both Tokyo and Beijing while also coordinating with Washington.

Main Event

Lee landed in Beijing on Sunday and met local Korean residents before formal talks. State media reported Xi hosted a welcoming ceremony at the Great Hall of the People; Lee then held scheduled meetings with Premier Li Qiang and Zhao Leji, the parliament chairman, before traveling on to Shanghai. South Korean officials described the visit as intended to stabilise a relationship many see as essential to Seoul’s strategic and economic calculations.

Lee told attendees in Beijing he hoped the visit would “fill in the gaps in Korea‑China relations, restore them to normal and upgrade them to a new level,” framing the trip as a reset rather than a pivot. Seoul said the agenda included security cooperation on the Korean Peninsula, efforts to curb coercive economic measures, and discussions about cultural market access for K‑pop and Korean dramas.

On security, Lee seeks Beijing’s help to influence North Korea toward denuclearization; Chinese authorities have long been a critical channel to Pyongyang on food, fuel and diplomatic support. Lee also intends to press China about maritime structures Beijing has built in waters between the two countries — Beijing describes them as fish‑farming facilities, but Seoul says they raise security concerns.

Lee is reported to plan a memorial visit in Shanghai to honor activists who fought for Korean independence from Japan, a symbolic gesture in the context of Beijing’s occasional appeal to shared historical grievances with Seoul and Tokyo. Seoul aims to balance that symbolism with parallel diplomatic outreach to Tokyo later this month.

Analysis & Implications

Economically, China remains indispensable: any sign Beijing might weaponize trade would alarm Seoul’s export‑dependent firms and the entertainment sector that relies on Chinese audiences. Lee’s request for assurances is as much about market access as it is about deterring future coercive measures. If China gives substantive comfort, South Korean exporters and cultural producers could regain steady access to a critical market.

On security, Beijing’s influence over Pyongyang is central to any realistic push toward denuclearization. Seoul needs Chinese pressure — including economic levers and diplomatic signals — to make North Korea more amenable to talks. However, Beijing balances that against its own strategic ties with Pyongyang; recent Chinese pledges to maintain a “traditional friendship” with North Korea complicate Seoul’s expectations.

Regionally, Lee’s visit underscores South Korea’s effort to navigate a strategic triangle among Washington, Beijing and Tokyo. Seoul reiterated respect for the One China policy even as it plans a Japan visit, reflecting a deliberate hedging strategy. How Seoul positions itself on Taiwan-related rhetoric will affect its relations with each neighbor and with the United States.

Culturally and politically, resolving China’s informal restrictions on K‑pop and K‑dramas would boost South Korea’s soft‑power revenues and signal a thaw. But Beijing’s demands — including subtle calls for political alignment on issues involving Japan — suggest concessions will be politically sensitive in Seoul, where public sentiment toward China and national sovereignty issues is mixed.

Comparison & Data

Item Most recent Previous benchmark
South Korean presidential visit to China Lee’s 2024 Beijing trip (arrived Sunday; met Xi Monday) Previous visit by a South Korean leader: 2019
Summits between Lee and Xi Second summit since Xi’s November visit to Seoul First summit during Xi’s November visit
Duration of China’s informal cultural curbs About 10 years Implemented after THAAD deployment in 2016

The table above places the current visit in recent diplomatic context: it is symbolically important (first presidential Beijing trip since 2019) and immediately consequential for trade, culture and security. While exact economic figures for potential losses or gains depend on policy changes, the sectors most likely to be affected are entertainment exports, fisheries/sea use, and export‑oriented manufacturers dependent on Chinese demand.

Reactions & Quotes

South Korean officials framed the visit as pragmatic engagement rather than ideological realignment. A senior Seoul official said Lee aimed to “restore normal relations and upgrade them to a new level,” emphasizing practical cooperation over rhetoric.

“This visit will serve as a new starting point to fill in the gaps in Korea‑China relations, restore them to normal and upgrade them to a new level.”

President Lee Jae‑myung (address to Koreans in Beijing)

Analysts noted Beijing’s interest in securing regional allies amid tensions with Japan. A China studies scholar observed Beijing’s leverage in asking partners to take a position on Japan, underscoring the diplomatic pressure at play.

“China may beat around the bush but its demand is clear: side with China and denounce Japan.”

Park Seung‑chan (Professor of China Studies, Yongin University)

Seoul’s national security director reiterated existing diplomatic positions while signalling ongoing coordination with partners. Officials also reaffirmed respect for established diplomatic frameworks even as Seoul pursues a balanced approach.

“The country respects the One China policy.”

Wi Sung‑lac (South Korea National Security Director)

Unconfirmed

  • Reports linking North Korea’s Monday hypersonic test to the US’s alleged capture of Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro are unverified and lack independent corroboration.
  • The precise concessions China might offer on easing cultural restrictions have not been disclosed and remain speculative until formal agreements are announced.
  • How much Beijing will constrain Pyongyang in concrete ways (sanctions, diplomatic isolation, or economic pressure) remains uncertain pending follow‑up actions and commitments.

Bottom Line

Lee’s trip to Beijing is a deliberate attempt to stabilise a relationship that is economically vital but politically fraught. Seoul is seeking assurances that China will not weaponize trade and cultural access amid heightened regional tensions, and it needs Beijing’s cooperation to influence North Korea’s behavior.

Outcomes are likely to be incremental: symbolic gestures and calibrated commitments rather than sweeping policy shifts. Observers should watch for concrete follow‑through on market access for entertainment, any changes in China’s maritime activities near Korean waters, and tangible Chinese pressure on Pyongyang as the clearest indicators of whether this summit produces durable change.

Sources

Leave a Comment